Staff Sergeant “Jack” from the 50th Battalion CEF

Staff Sergeant "Jack"

Staff Sergeant “Jack”

I have a new mystery to unravel and it involves a Staff Sergeant from the 50th Battalion CEF. Identifying”Jack” should have been relatively straight-forward but this has proven not to be the case.

I have a wonderful photograph of the 50th Battalion Sergeants and Staff Sergeants that shows Jack seated on the far right. This photo was likely taken just before they embarked for England in October 1915. The battalion was formed on July 1st, 1915 and so the insignia the men are wearing should reflect the changes introduced in May 1915, when a Company Sergeant Major became a Warrant Officer II and the chevrons were dropped in favour of a single crown worn on each forearm. There are at least 7 men in the photograph wearing three chevrons and a crown, four of whom are presumably Company Quarter-Master Sergeants and three who are Staff Sergeants.

For those of you doing similar insignia research you may find the following resources helpful:

The 50th Battalion CEF Nominal Roll, published on October 27, 1915, has not helped me to positively identify Jack. I’m assuming “Jack” was a nickname for John as there are no Sergeants with the Christian name “Jack”. There are three Sergeants whose first or second name is John however none are Company Quarter-Master or Staff Sergeants. I would expect that a Staff Sergeant’s rank would entitle him to a separate designation in the nominal roll but I may be wrong.

There is reason to believe that Jack did not survive the war and that he died at or around Vimy. Although one of the Sergeants, John McCall (#434233), died this was not until Feb. 11, 1919. There was a Company Quarter-Master Sergeant named Thomas Albert Narraway (#434567) who died on June 3, 1917 and is commemorated on the Vimy Memorial. This would support the rank shown in the photograph and the rumour of his death but not the fact that he was named “Jack”.

Is it possible a Thomas was nicknamed “Jack”? One theory, but not a particularly good one, is that Thomas was nicknamed “Jack” because there was another relation or friend named “Tom”. The family photos that include Jack also include a Captain from the 50th named “Tom”. Tom was involved with the Pay Office and its possible Jack was a Staff Sergeant that worked with him. The Nominal Roll has no record of a Captain named Thomas but he could have joined once the Battalion was in England (all the photos I have of Tom were taken in Britain). Could the family have nicknamed CQMS Thomas “Jack” to avoid confusion? It seems like a long shot and so the research continues.

2 replies

Tell Me What You Think!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s